<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bullz-Eye Blog &#187; Safe House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/tag/safe-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bullz-eye.com</link>
	<description>men&#039;s lifestyle blog, blog for guys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blu Tuesday: Con Games, Aliens and More</title>
		<link>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/06/05/blu-tuesday-con-games-aliens-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/06/05/blu-tuesday-con-games-aliens-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Zingale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act of Valor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu Tuesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falling Skies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falling Skies: The Complete First Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Gun Preacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new Blu-rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bullz-eye.com/?p=14376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m lucky if there’s a few good Blu-ray releases worth considering for my column each week, let alone actually sent by the studios to review, but that’s definitely not the case with this week’s impressive haul. While I didn’t get copies of “John Carter,” “Breaking Bad: Season Four,” or many of the Universal and Disney [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m lucky if there’s a few good Blu-ray releases worth considering for my column each week, let alone actually sent by the studios to review, but that’s definitely not the case with this week’s impressive haul. While I didn’t get copies of “John Carter,” “Breaking Bad: Season Four,” or many of the Universal and Disney catalog titles released, there was still plenty to choose from to make this edition of Blu Tuesday one of the best yet.</p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;The Sting&#8221;</div>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B007N31ZLA/bullzeyecom-20" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" src="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/the_sting.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="260" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>It’s been a while since the last time I sat down to watch “The Sting,” but it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that the movie still holds up remarkably well, especially now that it’s been digitally remastered as part of Universal’s 100th Anniversary Collector’s Series. Director George Roy Hill’s second collaboration with Robert Redford and Paul Newman epitomizes everything that made the 1970s such an amazing and transitional period for American cinema, beginning with David S. Ward’s Oscar-winning screenplay. While Hill does a great job making sense of the elaborate plot, and Redford and Newman replicate their wonderful chemistry from “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,” the film wouldn’t be such a timeless classic if it wasn&#8217;t for Ward’s smart and unpredictable script. From Newman’s poker showdown with Robert Shaw, to the climactic finale involving nearly every character in the story, there are so many memorable moments that it’s no wonder why &#8220;The Sting&#8221; remains as beloved today as when it was first released. It&#8217;s arguably the definitive con movie, and one that deserves a place in every film lover’s collection.</p>
<p><strong>Blu-ray Highlight</strong>: Although it’s appeared on previous editions, “The Art of the Sting” is an excellent three-part retrospective that features interviews with Robert Redford, Paul Newman and other cast and crew as they reflect back on making the film, including the choice to use ragtime music for the score, cast chemistry and anecdotes from the set.</p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;Falling Skies: The Complete First Season&#8221;</div>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B004LROMX4/bullzeyecom-20" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" src="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/falling_skies.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="270" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Science fiction has enjoyed a renaissance of sorts on television in recent years, thanks in large part to the advances made in technology. Unfortunately, many of the major networks haven’t had a lot of luck with the genre, which is why the idea of a smaller fish like TNT dipping its toes into the sci-fi pool sounded like a disaster waiting to happen. Perhaps best described as a mix between “War of the Worlds” and “The Walking Dead,” the show strikes a good balance between the action sequences and the human drama that occurs within the Resistance, even if the writing and acting aren’t necessarily of the highest quality. It’s obvious from the first episode that “Falling Skies” is working with a limited budget, but while the special effects are only slightly better than your average SyFy made-for-TV movie, they’re never a crutch to the series. Granted, it probably won’t blow you away, but for sci-fi fans still mourning the loss of shows like “V,” it’s a pretty decent substitute.</p>
<p><strong>Blu-ray Highlight</strong>: If you&#8217;re looking for a more in-depth conversation about specific episodes, then the included audio commentaries (five in all, featuring producer Greg Beeman, actor Noah Wyle and writer Mark Verheidan) are the way to go, but I enjoyed the footage of the “Falling Skies” panel from last year’s San Diego Comic-Con a little more. Though the panel isn’t available in its entirety, it features most of the cast (as well as a few of the producers) discussing the first season in a much broader capacity.</p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;Safe House&#8221;</div>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B005LAIGSC/bullzeyecom-20" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" src="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/safe_house.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="260" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>If I’m being completely honest, I don’t really remember “Safe House” all that well, but that’s part of the problem. Despite starring two of the most charismatic actors in the industry in Denzel Washington and Ryan Reynolds, the movie is pretty forgettable. The actors do the best they can with the material that they’ve been given, but despite some small changes to the formula, the film is just another run-of-the-mill action thriller with hardly a surprising moment throughout. One of the few things that does work in the film is the setting. In addition to boasting a variety of unique locations (like the newly built soccer stadium), Cape Town, South Africa is a fresh and exotic locale that Hollywood hasn’t filmed to death. There’s also a really great action sequence with Reynolds and “The Killing” star Joel Kinneman (who previously worked with director Daniel Espinosa on the Swedish hit “Snabba Cash”) that will likely go down as one of the best fight scenes of the year, but for a movie packed with this much talent, there should have been a lot more highlights than that.</p>
<p><strong>Blu-ray Highlight</strong>: There really isn’t a standout special feature on Universal&#8217;s two-disc release, but there are still a few good extras worth checking out, including a short but sweet making-of featurette that covers a range of topics like the script, casting and production; an in-depth look at the film’s fight choreography; and a featurette on ex-CIA operative Luis Falcon III’s assistance in making the movie as accurate as possible.</p>
<p><span id="more-14376"></span></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;Act of Valor&#8221;</div>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B005LAIGZU/bullzeyecom-20" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" src="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/act_of_valor.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="260" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>On the surface, “Act of Valor” sounds like yet another generic action movie destined for the Wal-Mart bargain bin, but what sets it apart from its military-themed brethren is that it stars active duty U.S. Navy SEALs in the lead roles. It gives the film a level of realism that you simply couldn’t achieve with regular actors, and although that means making certain sacrifices in other areas (let’s be honest, these guys weren’t cast because they’re good actors, but because they actually do this stuff for a living), it’s an experiment that works pretty well. The few scenes that do rely on their limited acting ability aren’t pretty to watch, but they’re rock stars when it comes to the action sequences, which are peppered with some cool POV camera work that is the closest most people will ever get to the real thing. It doesn’t change the fact that “Act of Valor” is essentially a feature-length recruitment video for the “Call of Duty” crowd, but I’ll take this over Michael Bay’s military fetish films any day of the week.</p>
<p><strong>Blu-ray Highlight</strong>: The audio commentary with directors/producers Mike McCoy and Scott Waugh is filled with a ton of great information about making the movie, including the technical aspects of filming the combat sequences, the real stories that inspired them, and the level of realism that was achieved thanks to the cooperation of the Navy.</p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;Machine Gun Preacher&#8221;</div>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B005FITIF0/bullzeyecom-20" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" src="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/machine_gun_preacher.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="270" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Despite its decidedly B-movie title, “Machine Gun Preacher” isn’t a grindhouse film at all (although it would make for a killer double feature alongside “Hobo with a Shotgun”), but rather a dull and tediously paced drama that isn’t nearly as entertaining as a blaxploitation movie about a gun-toting preacher would have been. In fact, for a film that’s based on a true story, “Machine Gun Preacher” is riddled with more clichés than most pieces of fiction. The early stuff involving Sam Childers’ evolution from bad boy biker to reformed Christian is fairly interesting, but once he arrives in Africa on his first goodwill trip, the movie begins to lose steam as it falls into a repetitive cycle that jumps back and forth between Childers’ home life in Pennsylvania and doing God’s work in Africa. Gerard Butler does a good enough job playing the real-life missionary, but Childers himself isn&#8217;t a very likable subject, and so it&#8217;s difficult to truly care about him. A documentary probably would have been the better way to go, because at least then it might have had some sort of emotional impact.</p>
<p><strong>Blu-ray Highlight</strong>: Instead of the typical audio commentary, director Marc Forster sits down for a somewhat brief discussion about the movie, including the challenges of maintaining the story’s authenticity, filming in South Africa, and casting the lead roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/06/05/blu-tuesday-con-games-aliens-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Soon: A Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to February</title>
		<link>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/01/26/coming-soon-a-moviegoers-guide-to-february/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/01/26/coming-soon-a-moviegoers-guide-to-february/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Zingale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coming Soon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act of Valor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chronicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars: The Phantom Menace 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Woman in Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Means War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wanderlust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bullz-eye.com/?p=8701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For as much abuse as January receives for being a bad movie magnet, February isn’t any better, especially when you factor in the bombardment of cheesy chick flicks being unloaded in time for Valentine’s Day. In fact, with the exception of maybe one or two releases, there isn&#8217;t anything even worth getting excited about &#8211; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/february_movies.jpg"><img src="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/february_movies.jpg" alt="" title="february_movies" width="477" height="248" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8883" /></a></p>
<p>For as much abuse as January receives for being a bad movie magnet, February isn’t any better, especially when you factor in the bombardment of cheesy chick flicks being unloaded in time for Valentine’s Day. In fact, with the exception of maybe one or two releases, there isn&#8217;t anything even worth getting excited about &#8211; unless you&#8217;re a really big &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; fan, in which case, keep reading. January was by no means a great month for moviegoers, but it was a heckuva lot better than what February has in store.</p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;THE WOMAN IN BLACK&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Daniel Radcliffe, Janet McTeer, Ciarán Hinds and Emma Shorey<br />
<strong>What</strong>: A young lawyer travels to a remote village where he discovers the vengeful ghost of a scorned woman is terrorizing the locals.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 3rd<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: There’s no way in hell that I’m going to see this movie – not because it doesn’t look like it might be good, but rather because there are few things that scare me as unconditionally as creepy old ghost women from horror movies. (Despite really enjoying last year’s “Insidious,” I couldn’t sleep for weeks afterwards.) And that’s a shame, because “The Woman in Black” looks like it might actually rise above the typical horror trash that populates this time of year (see: “The Devil Inside”). Adapted from Susan Hill’s novel of the same name (which was also turned into a successful stage play), the script was written by Matthew Vaughn’s go-to scribe Jane Goldman and stars Daniel Radcliffe in his first post-Potter role. The actor undoubtedly had plenty of offers on the table, so the fact that he chose this Hammer horror film certainly speaks of its potential.</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_355901" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=355901&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/355901/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=355901&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/355901/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;CHRONICLE&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Michael B. Jordan, Alex Russell, Dane DeHaan and Michael Kelly<br />
<strong>What</strong>: Three friends gain superpowers after making an incredible discovery, only for their friendship to be tested when one of them embraces his dark side.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 3rd<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: I didn’t even know about this movie until a few months ago when a friend sent me a link to the trailer, but consider me cautiously intrigued. Though I’m just as sick of the whole found footage fad as everyone else, “Chronicle” is set up in a way that it doesn’t have to adhere to the normal rules of the genre. For starters, since the main characters have superpowers (namely, telekinesis), they can put the camera pretty much anywhere they want, allowing for a more dynamic range of shots beyond the trademark shaky cam. The trailer also seems to suggest that there will be a healthy dose of action, so as long as the story isn’t a complete mess and director Josh Trank can keep the movie’s mystery a secret, this superhero “Cloverfield” could be the first surprise hit of the year.</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_408697" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=408697&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/408697/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=408697&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/408697/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<p><span id="more-8701"></span></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;SAFE HOUSE&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Denzel Washington, Ryan Reynolds, Brendan Gleeson and Vera Farmiga<br />
<strong>What</strong>: A young CIA agent must go on the run with a rogue operative after the safe house he&#8217;s being held at is compromised by men trying to break him out.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 10th<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: There’s something about Denzel Washington playing a villain that audiences really seem to enjoy, although it’s probably just because we’re so used to seeing him as the good guy. But unlike “Training Day” and “American Gangster,” I have a sneaking suspicion that his character in “Safe House” isn’t actually bad at all, which is a win-win for the actor. Having someone of his caliber also makes director Daniel Espinosa’s job a whole lot easier, because Washington can practically sleepwalk through a role like this and still be compelling. It doesn’t hurt that Espinosa was able to land such a great supporting cast either – particularly Ryan Reynolds, who’s proven on numerous occasions that he’s a much better actor than many people give him credit for. And if the two of them work together as well as I think they will, &#8220;Safe House&#8221; should be lots of fun.</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_396519" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=396519&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/396519/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=396519&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/396519/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;STAR WARS: THE PHANTOM MENACE 3D&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, and Jake Lloyd<br />
<strong>What</strong>: Two Jedi Knights uncover a political conspiracy when they&#8217;re sent as emissaries to the blockaded planet of Naboo… in 3D!<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 10th<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: If there’s one thing that I can’t stand more than new 3D movies, it’s older films that have been post-converted into the format in an attempt by the studios to squeeze every last dollar out of the moviegoing public. There’s no one better at milking a cash cow than George Lucas, so it’s not much of a surprise that he’s decided to release the “Star Wars” saga in 3D less than a year after its Blu-ray debut. What is surprising, however, is that he’s chosen to lead off with “The Phantom Menace,” undoubtedly the most hated installment of all the live-action films. And yet, that doesn’t change the fact that I’ll still be waiting in line on opening weekend alongside my fellow “Star Wars” fans to watch it anyway, especially if it helps the chances of seeing the original trilogy on the big screen.</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_423147" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=423147&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/423147/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=423147&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/423147/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;THIS MEANS WAR&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Chris Pine, Tom Hardy, Reese Witherspoon and Chelsea Handler<br />
<strong>What</strong>: Two of the CIA&#8217;s best operatives wage an epic battle against one another after they discover that they’re dating the same woman.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 14th<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: You could get dragged by your wife or girlfriend to the new Rachel McAdams and Channing Tatum romantic drama “The Vow” for Valentine’s Day, or you could take her to go see this instead. If that doesn’t sound like a very difficult decision, it’s because it isn’t. She gets two handsome guys to fawn over, and you get to stare at the interminably cute Reese Witherspoon while two of Hollywood’s coolest leading men face off in a battle of wits, fists and explosions. Director McG may spend more time these days developing television shows than making movies, but “This Means War” (great title, by the way) looks like a welcome return for the director, who knows a thing or two about blending action with comedy. And if he can manage to strike the right balance, he could be sitting on the next “Mr. and Mrs. Smith.” Is there a more perfect date movie than this?</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_384649" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=384649&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/384649/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=384649&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/384649/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Nicolas Cage, Idris Elba, Johnny Whitworth and Ciarán Hinds<br />
<strong>What</strong>: While hiding out in Eastern Europe, Johnny Blaze is called upon to stop the devil, who is trying to take human form.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 17th<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: After 2007&#8242;s disastrous “Ghost Rider” set a new low for the comic book genre, I figured that would be the last we’d ever see of Marvel&#8217;s B-list hero. But for some reason, Sony has decided to give the character a second chance, handing over the reins to the directing duo of Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor. Strangely enough, though, “Spirit of Vengeance” isn’t a sequel, but a reboot of sorts, despite the fact that Nicolas Cage is reviving the title role. The actor surely had a hand in picking the filmmakers this time around, but while Neveldine and Taylor may seem like the perfect guys to take on such an incredibly bizarre superhero (you needn’t look any further than the “Crank” films to understand why), they might have gone <em>too</em> far over the top. Case in point: the shot of Ghost Rider pissing fire. It can’t be any worse than the first movie, but will anyone care?</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_344309" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=344309&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/344309/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=344309&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/344309/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;WANDERLUST&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Paul Rudd, Jennifer Aniston, Malin Akerman, Justin Theroux and Alan Alda<br />
<strong>What</strong>: Rattled by sudden unemployment, a Manhattan couple experiments with alternative living options by moving to a rural commune where free love rules.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 24th<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: Fans of David Wain’s cult comedy “Wet Hot American Summer” might never see the rumored prequel that’s been bandied about in recent years, but “Wanderlust” could help fill that void thanks to a similar setting and appearances by several of the same actors. While the movie looks a little too good-natured and conventional for my taste, if it’s even remotely as funny as Wain’s last collaboration with Paul Rudd (“Role Models”), we could be in for a real treat. Rudd certainly has the talent to turn an average film into a good one, but save for her against-type performance in last year&#8217;s “Horrible Bosses,” Jennifer Aniston is usually poison. Sure, it’ll be fun to see the pair reunited for the first time since “Friends,” but people are probably more excited about Aniston’s scenes with boyfriend Justin Theroux, whose tabloid relationship could do with a little good publicity.</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_413315" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=413315&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/413315/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=413315&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/413315/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;ACT OF VALOR&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Timothy Gibbs, Dimiter Marinov, Alex Veadov and U.S. Navy SEALs<br />
<strong>What</strong>: An elite team of Navy SEALs embarks on a covert mission to recover a kidnapped CIA agent.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 24th<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: On the surface, “Act of Valor” sounds like yet another generic action film destined for the Wal-Mart bargain bin, but what sets it apart from its military-themed brethren is that it stars active duty U.S. Navy SEALs. As a result, the movie will likely feature a level of realism that’s never been captured on film before, even if that means making some sacrifices in other areas. Let’s be honest: these soldiers weren’t hired because they’re good actors, but because they’re real-life stuntmen who do this for a living. It’s a pretty interesting experiment on the part of Relativity Media – which promises a one-of-a-kind adrenaline rush jam-packed with wall-to-wall action – but it also doesn&#8217;t hide the fact that the movie is essentially a feature-length recruiting video for the &#8220;Call of Duty&#8221; crowd.</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_426887" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=426887&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/426887/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=426887&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/426887/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
<div class="subhead_block_black01">&#8220;GONE&#8221;</div>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Amanda Seyfried, Daniel Sunjata, Wes Bentley and Jennifer Carpenter<br />
<strong>What</strong>: When her sister disappears, Jill is convinced that the serial killer who kidnapped her two years ago has returned and sets out to once again face her abductor.<br />
<strong>When</strong>: February 24th<br />
<strong>Why</strong>: I’m really rooting for Amanda Seyfried to succeed – not only is she talented, but she’s also easy on the eyes – but as long as the actress continues to pick projects like “Gone,” she’ll never make the jump to the A-list. Her latest film looks like the kind of paint-by-numbers thriller that’s entirely dependent on some twist ending – one that the audience will no doubt see a mile away because that’s what they’ve been trained to do ever since M. Night Shyamalan made twist endings trendy. No matter how good the twist may be, however, “Gone” has the makings of a direct-to-video reject that isn’t worth sitting through to get there. In fact, if the studio wasn’t trying to make a quick buck by releasing it in the dead of the winter movie season, we wouldn’t even be talking about it.</p>
<p><object width="477" height="385" id="gorillanationPlayer_be004_playlist_17_be004_video_426889" data="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=426889&#038;&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/426889/&#038;autostart=false" class="SpringboardSwitcher" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/xplayer/yo033.swf?pid=be004&#038;siteId=17&#038;videoId=426889&#038;file=http://cms.springboard.gorillanation.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/17/3/426889/&#038;autostart=false" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/01/26/coming-soon-a-moviegoers-guide-to-february/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
