<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 007 One by One &#8211; Goldfinger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/10/31/007-one-by-one-goldfinger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/10/31/007-one-by-one-goldfinger/</link>
	<description>men&#039;s lifestyle blog, blog for guys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:41:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Westal</title>
		<link>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/10/31/007-one-by-one-goldfinger/#comment-490713</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Westal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 02:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bullz-eye.com/?p=20812#comment-490713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know you&#039;ll never, ever believe me, but &quot;whitewashing&quot; was not my intention and it&#039;s entirely fair to have a different reaction -- though I wish people would avoid the sort of language that tends to shut down a conversation, rather than start one. Why do you seem to assume that I am a bad person -- or at least someone who is unconcerned and unbothered by sexual violence? Why do you think that is a good way to approach this important subject? 

Did it ever occur that, as a writer for an online men&#039;s magazine, I might actually be attempting to do a service by even bringing this matter up to my male audience? I could easily have ignored the scene entirely, but I actually felt it needed to be mentioned and discussed. But, of course, you appear to assume I&#039;m some sort of ultrasexist/misogynist because making those kind of assumptions about people you don&#039;t know anything about is a big part of what the Internet is all about. I really have seen very similar scenes to this in countless movies and, really, by comparison, I think it&#039;s mild. Mainly because Bond and Galore actually are close to evenly matched, physically and mentally. That&#039;s really not always the case. 

It&#039;s a very bad habit of people on the &#039;net, rampant on political blogs which is probably why this note got me so worked up. I wish everyone would stop it but I think for a lot of people it&#039;s easier to assume everyone who sees things even a little bit different from them is some kind of apologist for evil. I&#039;ve had enough of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you&#8217;ll never, ever believe me, but &#8220;whitewashing&#8221; was not my intention and it&#8217;s entirely fair to have a different reaction &#8212; though I wish people would avoid the sort of language that tends to shut down a conversation, rather than start one. Why do you seem to assume that I am a bad person &#8212; or at least someone who is unconcerned and unbothered by sexual violence? Why do you think that is a good way to approach this important subject? </p>
<p>Did it ever occur that, as a writer for an online men&#8217;s magazine, I might actually be attempting to do a service by even bringing this matter up to my male audience? I could easily have ignored the scene entirely, but I actually felt it needed to be mentioned and discussed. But, of course, you appear to assume I&#8217;m some sort of ultrasexist/misogynist because making those kind of assumptions about people you don&#8217;t know anything about is a big part of what the Internet is all about. I really have seen very similar scenes to this in countless movies and, really, by comparison, I think it&#8217;s mild. Mainly because Bond and Galore actually are close to evenly matched, physically and mentally. That&#8217;s really not always the case. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a very bad habit of people on the &#8216;net, rampant on political blogs which is probably why this note got me so worked up. I wish everyone would stop it but I think for a lot of people it&#8217;s easier to assume everyone who sees things even a little bit different from them is some kind of apologist for evil. I&#8217;ve had enough of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.bullz-eye.com/2012/10/31/007-one-by-one-goldfinger/#comment-464708</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bullz-eye.com/?p=20812#comment-464708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Today, of course, this kind of behavior is deemed sexual harassment at best and rape at worst. Intriguingly, Goldfinger’s seduction scene actually comes across more playful and a lot less offensive than most scenes of this type, perhaps because Pussy is arguably Bond’s equal in many respects. When she kisses Bond back, we’re pretty sure it’s not her weakness or fear, but her suddenly awakened feelings that are driving her. Pussy is nobody’s doormat.&lt;/b&gt;


Nice attempt at whitewashing this scene.  It still makes me sick to my stomach whenever I come across it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Today, of course, this kind of behavior is deemed sexual harassment at best and rape at worst. Intriguingly, Goldfinger’s seduction scene actually comes across more playful and a lot less offensive than most scenes of this type, perhaps because Pussy is arguably Bond’s equal in many respects. When she kisses Bond back, we’re pretty sure it’s not her weakness or fear, but her suddenly awakened feelings that are driving her. Pussy is nobody’s doormat.</b></p>
<p>Nice attempt at whitewashing this scene.  It still makes me sick to my stomach whenever I come across it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
